“They just represent his rather narrow interpretation of genetic destiny.” In many ways, Isaacson observes, Rufus is wiser than his father.Įmmanuelle Charpentier, who shared the Nobel prize in chemistry with Doudna. “My dad’s statements might make him out to be a bigot and discriminatory,” he once said. The voice from the kitchen belonged to Rufus, Watson’s middle-aged son who suffers from schizophrenia. When the conversation sails dangerously close to the race issue, someone shouts from the kitchen: “If you are going to let him say these things, then I am going to have to ask you to leave.” The 91-year-old Watson shrugs and changes tack. Isaacson, who is to interview Watson, therefore has to make his way to the house on the nearby campus that the scientist has been allowed to keep. It is 2019 and a scientific meeting is under way at the famous Cold Spring Harbour Laboratory in New York State, but James Watson, the co-discoverer of the structure of DNA, is banned from it because of the racist and scientifically unfounded views he has expressed on intelligence. O ne of the most striking passages in Walter Isaacson’s new book comes towards the end.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |